A spokesperson for The Glasgow School of Art said:
“We welcome the Committee’s continued work and in particular the contributions made by Historic Environment Scotland who have an extensive working knowledge of the building and project unlike that of other witnesses heard today.
“The specific submission from Stephen Mackenize would appear to have not been based on a thorough analysis of the GSA’s own written submission and oral evidence. Over the course of the next week, the GSA will be providing the Committee with supplementary evidence and reports or other specific information requested by them, in order to inform the Committee’s further deliberations.”